Fannie Mae announced a plan on Thursday that will allow borrowers facing foreclosure to lease their homes. The program, called Deed for Lease or D4L for short, allows borrowers facing foreclosure to hand their deed to the lender in exchange for paying the market rate rent on the home for at least 12 months.

To qualify for the program, borrowers have to have mortgages insured by Fannie Mae, be unable to qualify for President Obama’s mortgage modification program, and be unsuccessful renegotiating with their lenders. While eligible borrowers would have to voluntarily give up the deeds to their homes, they would be able to stay for at least a year, providing that they paid the market rate rent. Rents would then be renewable on a month-to-month basis. Eligible borrowers must document that the new market rate rent is no greater than 31% of their gross income to qualify for Deed for Lease.

The Deed for Lease program is an extremely interesting and valuable way to keep delinquent borrowers in their homes, or merely to allow time for a transition. The program may be especially valuable for families with children, whom they do not want to remove from their schools in the middle of the year. It will help give families more time to come up with options. It will also help underwater homeowners– especially in areas that have seen property values drop significantly.

Furthermore, since tenants of qualifying borrowers are also eligible for the program, Deed for Lease will help tenants whose landlords face foreclosure. As a result, it appears that, though Fannie Mae provided no estimates for how many borrowers will be eligible for the program, Deed Lease looks to be a promising alternative to severely delinquent borrowers with Fannie Mae loans facing foreclosure–and for their tenants.

More information about the program can be found at www.efanniemae.com.

The US House of Representatives

The new homebuyer’s tax credit extension that we have discussed extensively in the past week was passed by the House of Representatives today. Now that the bill has been passed by Congress, it will go to President Obama for his signature.  The bill passed by a vote of 403-12 after it unanimously passed in the Senate. The bill is expected to be signed into law by the President tomorrow.

For more posts on this topic, please see:

Breaking News: Deal Announced to Extend New Homebuyer’s Tax Credit Through April 2010

Reflecting on the Impact of an Extended Tax Credit

With the 2009 fiscal year ending on September 30, this month’s HECM volume report revealed a new list of the top 10 reverse mortgage lenders, very much changed from that of last fiscal year.  The list is below, compared to that of 2009 FY. However, given how close many of the lenders are to each other in terms of the number of HECMs they endorsed, it is by no means clear how the list will shake out over the next few months.

October 2009:

1. Wells Fargo

2. Bank of America

3. MetLife Bank

4. Financial Freedom Acquisition

5. One Reverse Mortgage

6. 1st AAA Reverse Mortgage

7. First Mariner Bank

8. Security One Lending

9. Harvard Home Mortgage

10. Stay in Home Mortgage

Fiscal Year 2009:

1. Wells Fargo

2. Bank of America

3. World Alliance Financial Corp

4. Financial Freedom

5. One Reverse Mortgage

6. MetLife Bank

7. Countrywide Financial

8. Generation Mortgage

9. Urban Financial Group

10. 1st AAA Reverse Mortgage

Thus, from last year’s top 10, only 6 remain in the top 10 for October. The complete list for October can be found on the HUD website. The changes will also be reflected on the Reverse Mortgage Guides website in the Lender Directory in the near future.

We knew that reverse mortgage applications were likely to jump to new levels in September, but we did not know how much- until now. September’s FHA Outlook report shows a 72.4% increase in HECM applications in September versus August.  19,055 HECM applications were submitted in September, versus 11,051 in August.

Therefore, while only 9,473 reverse mortgages were endorsed by the FHA in September, up from 8,933 in August, the number appears poised to climb in October and November, as those who applied before the principle limit factors fell 10% on October 1st complete their applications. It is also interesting to note that the number of purchases and refinances made up a very small percentage of the reverse mortgages endorsed, with 137 HECMs for Purchase and 790 HECM Refinances endorsed in September.

Finally, as the fiscal year ended, it is good to see that the FHA’s predictions were fairly in line with the actual results.  162,619 HECM applications were filed, as opposed to the 165,000 projected in FY 2009. Of those, 114,691 HECMs were endorsed in FY 2009. This is an increase of 2.3% from last year, though still below the projected 119,700 endorsements. Nonetheless, it appears that the reverse mortgage industry grew in FY 2009, despite the recession, and appears poised for a strong beginning to FY 2010.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning November 3, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.494

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.744

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.994

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.244

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.91

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.16

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.41

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.66

The HECM LIBOR APR remained almost unchanged for the sixth consecutive week. However, the expected rates continued to rise. This week saw a dramatic increase by .08 for the borrowers.  It will be interesting to see when the APR finally changes, and, when it does, whether the expected rates will adjust is the same direction.

Last week a bi-partisan deal was announced in the Senate that will likely pave the way for the new homebuyer’s tax credit to be extended through April 2010.  The deal also includes plans for a significant expansion of the tax credit, raising the income requirements to $125,000 per individual and $225,000 per couple from $75,000 per individual and $150,000 per couple. This expansion means that many more individuals will be eligible for the tax credit than were previously. Finally, the deal added a $6,500 tax credit will be available to homeowners wishing to move out of their current home into a more expensive one.

I have been thinking about the deal all weekend, and I worry about its effects. While the goal of the credit is to strengthen the market and help bring home prices back up, increasing income requirements and adding a tax credit to incentivize trading up seems like it risks exacerbating the current problems in the housing market.  Many of the current problems in the housing market have been created by homeowners (many first-time homeowners) taking out mortgages that were more than they could afford to pay in order to buy homes. Even when they could afford the mortgage, the recent economic problems have led many to be out of work or find their401(k)s and pensions to be less than they had expected. Consequently, the number of foreclosures and mortgage delinquencies reached all time highs in recent months.

In light of these developments, some proposed that maybe homeownership should no longer be an essential part of the American Dream.  It was argued that it is a disservice to put people into homes they cannot afford. While the tax credit is not a very large sum of money, it is enough money to push individuals to act in uncertain times.  A realtor in Portland, ME commented that nearly 70% of their clients were motivated by the tax credit. Yes, the housing market could use a boost, but when individuals are making a significant long-term financial decision for a short-term financial incentive, it seems like many poor choices can occur.

Reverse mortgages and refinances are available to help homeowners who find themselves over-extended, but reverse mortgages are only available to those over 62, and refinances and short pays have been extremely hard to get.  To avoid another housing crisis, the government does need to stimulate the market, but putting more borrowers into homes they cannot afford does not seem to be a safe way to do so.

The Senate announced a bi-partisan deal yesterday to extend the new homebuyer’s tax credit through April 2010. The deal will extend the $8,000 tax credit, which was set to expire in weeks, on homes with values up to $800,000.  While the previous tax credit only applied to homebuyers with salaries of up to $75,000/year for individual and $150,000/couples, the deal raises the requirement, so that the tax credit will now apply to homebuyers with salaries of up to $125,000/year for individuals and $225,000 for couples. This will serve to make the vast majority of homebuyers available for the tax credit. In addition, a  new $6,500 tax credit will be available to home owners wishing to move out of their current homes into more expensive ones.

The extension of the tax credit is expected to cost the government $10.2 billion, which will be offset by delaying a tax-break for U.S. based international corporations from 2010 to 2017.

The extension of the tax credit (as well as the new credit for current homeowners) is expected to help the housing market and real estate industry bounce back from the housing crisis.  It is hoped that the tax credit, which has been successful in the past year, will help the market return to its former strength in 2010.

Yesterday, Congress passed the continuing resolution we discussed yesterday, extending the HECM loan limit through the 2010 fiscal year.  The continuing resolution is now headed for the President’s signature, which it is expected to receive.  The continuing resolution means that the reverse mortgage loan limit will remain at $625,500.  The change reduces uncertainty about the future of the loan limits for HECM reverse mortgages.  As mentioned yesterday, the continuing resolution also includes jumbo conforming loans and conforming loans, two kinds of forward mortgages.

An appropriations bill has been proposed that will extend the FHA reverse mortgage limits until the end of 2010.  The current limit of $625,500 is currently set to expire at the end of the year unless new appropriations are made. The appropriations bill still needs to pass the House of Representatives and the Senate. The extensions would also apply to Jumbo Conforming Loans and Conforming Loans, two kinds of forward or conventional mortgages.

Many in the industry appear to be hopeful that the bill will be passed before the limits expire.  It is probably too early to become extremely concerned about the expiring limits, but with the bill needing to pass through both houses of Congress, it is something to keep an eye on.

A day after positive news about existing home sales and housing prices, the data on new home sales sent a negative current through the economy.  This morning it was reported that new home sales fell unexpectedly after 5 months of consecutive increases. Home sales fell from a seasonally-adjusted 417,000 new home sales in August to 402,000 in September, a decrease of 3.6%.  But a survey of economists had predicted that the number of home sales would rise to 440,000 in September, leading to a prediction nearly 10% higher than the actual amount.

This is not the first time we have seen mixed housing data. While it is easy to speculate on the ups and downs of the market, only time can tell whether the bumps are telling of actual trends or merely slight deviations from the mean.  This month, all the positive data about home prices and existing home sales, as well as climbing orders for long lasting goods, show that the industry may be beginning to recover, even if that recovery is a slow one with some set backs along the way.

In the Case-Schiller report data released this morning, US home prices continue to show improvement in August. The Standard & Poor’s/Case-Schiller index showed a seasonally-adjusted 1 percent improvement in August over the previous month.  16 of the 20 cities in the index saw their prices rise. Only four–Cleveland, Las Vegas, Charlotte, and Seattle–saw their home prices decline.

While the numbers are still down compared to last year, the continued upward trend is a nice change from last winter, when all cities saw their prices decline for several months on end.  Many believe that the housing market is now turning around.  However, the prices are down significantly.  The average price today is equivalent to 2003 levels.  In Detroit, they are at the same levels they were at in 1995.  Compared to last August, prices are down 11.3 percent.  As a result, many of the problems we have seen recently in regards to underwater homeowners and foreclosures seem likely to continue in the near future. As the New York Times said, in many places, it’s as if the housing boom never happened.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning October 27, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.494

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.744

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.994

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.244

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.83

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.08

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.33

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.58

The HECM LIBOR APR remained almost unchanged for the fifth consecutive week. Meanwhile, the expected rates continued to rise, though they only rose by three hundredths of a point.  One wonders when the APR will finally change, and, when it does, in which direction it will go.

HUD released the long awaited new RESPA FAQs this morning. The document contains many common questions and answers about complying with RESPA.

RESPA, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act first passed in 1974, is the source of many of the basic federal reverse mortgage required disclosures, including the HUD-1 statement and the Good Faith Estimate (GFE).  Most of the questions in the RESPA FAQs released this morning address the HUD-1 and GFE. There is also a specific section on reverse mortgages.

RESPA Rule FAQs

After already announcing a delay of the implementation of Mortgagee Letter 2009-19 to case numbers assigned on or after November 2, 2009, the Reverse Review reported today that HUD has delayed the implementation further. Guidance is expected from HUD in the next two weeks clarifying Mortgagee Letter 2009-19 and offering additional leniencies to address the difficult current market conditions.  The changes will then go into effect on December 7, 2009.

For those who forgot, Mortgagee Letter 2009-19 changed the condominium approval process and condo unit eligibility for reverse mortgages. The Mortgagee Letter can be found at Mortgagee Letter 2009-19.

Today’s Wall Street Journal featured a very interesting article on how Bank of America is using reverse mortgages to save senior borrowers. The cases include situations where Bank of America has taken a significant write down to allow the borrowers to stay in their homes.  But not all borrowers may receive the same treatment as the borrowers highlighted in the article. As the story notes, most borrowers who received the modified reverse mortgage had taken out option ARMs.

Option ARMs (Option Adjustable Rate Mortgages) have become “the new subprime mortgages,” leading many borrowers into foreclosure. 32% of option ARM borrowers were delinquent or in foreclosure last month, compared with 48% of subprime mortgage borrowers.  Unlike subprime mortgages, option ARM mortgages generally went to borrowers with good credit, including seniors with significant equity in their homes looking to refinance. The option ARMs have also proved difficult to modify, since the low interest rates on the loan often cannot be lowered any further.   Lawsuits have been filed by borrowers claiming they were misinformed of the loan’s complicated structure, which in many cases can lead payments to balloon after a few years.

As a result of the lawsuits, as well as the settlement of a suit against Countrywide, which was since acquired by Bank of America, Bank of America has agreed to modify option ARMs and subprime mortgages where possible.  While it appears that Bank of America has so far only issued about 20 reverse mortgages to borrowers with option ARMs, it looks like a good start to fixing a significant problem. Borrowers with option ARMs from Bank of America may want to talk to their servicer or the bank about a modification, perhaps with a reverse mortgage.

Bank of America announced this morning that it is resuming offering fixed-rate reverse mortgage loans in Illinois.  The decision comes after Bank of America has reviewed its policies relative to Illinois’ High Risk Home Loan Act (HRHLA) and determined that the loans can be offered as long as they meet the following criteria:

- Closing costs, defined as all costs paid by the borrower directly or indirectly, do not exceed 5% of the total loan amount.

- Bank of America’s  high cost worksheet must be completed.

- Bank of America’s high cost worksheet must be submitted to fulfillment and indicate that the loan has “passed” the high cost test.

Says the letter, “Bank of America stands behind its commitment to provide clarity and transparency to home lending. To that end, we have chosen not to engage in the production of high cost loans.”  Bank of America also announced that loans declined when the product was suspended September 16th can now be re-submitted for approval. The decision should come as welcome news to reverse mortgage lenders in Illinois.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning October 20, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.495

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.745

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.995

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.245

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.89

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.05

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.30

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.55

The HECM LIBOR APR remained almost unchanged for the fourth consecutive week.  However, expected rates rose significantly. The expected rates are up .15 this week.  One hopes this is not the beginning of an upward trend. After a short week last week, these rates will be good for a full seven days.

A report by a bipartisan Congressional oversight panel ruled today that the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) is not doing enough to help the current drivers of the foreclosure crisis – borrowers with good credit who have lost their jobs and those with complex mortgages. While the administration has lauded HAMP as it reached the crucial mark of 500,000 mortgages given trial modifications, the report counters. Many of those with modified mortgages will see their payments rise significantly after 5 years, leading some to argue that foreclosure is being postponed, not avoided.

It is true that the problem in the foreclosure crisis now is no longer sub-prime mortgages. Alt-A mortgages, and other products with ballooning rates, have hit many hard.  Many borrowers with good credit have also been hit, especially those that have lost their jobs or have seen their home values plummet in recent months.  Finally, as we have reported, foreclosures in high value areas have increased as well. As a result, modifying sub-prime mortgages or mortgages with high interest rates will not help many of the borrowers at risk or already in foreclosure. A new solution will be necessary to allay the losses of the recession.

Reverse Mortgage Guides added two new videos for consumers to the site today.  The videos can also be found on YouTube.  Reverse Mortgage Guides is excited to be able to offer this valuable feature to our visitors.

The videos can currently be found on the “What is a Reverse Mortgage” page and the “Pros and Cons” page.  More videos will be added soon.

In addition, if you would like to contribute a video to the site, please comment below or contact reva.minkoff (at) reversemortgageguides.org.

This weekend Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed AB 329 into law in California. The bill finally establishes the Reverse Mortgage Elder Protection Act of 2009. The bill prohibits cross-selling, requires the lender to provide the borrower with no fewer than 10 nonprofit HUD-approved counseling agencies, and requires the lender to provide the borrower with a checklist of issues to discuss with the reverse mortgage counselor.  The loan application will be unable to be approved without the signed checklist.  However, given that the first two requirements are included in national legislation, the main feature of the bill will be the addition of the checklist to the reverse mortgage counseling process.

The provisions of the bill will be administered by both the California Department of Real Estate and the California Department of Corporations.

The bill can be found at: AB 329

NRMLA President Peter Bell testified in front of the House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development today as part of a panel of witnesses on the future of the FHA. While Commissioner Stevens’ statements were written up in the New York Times, Bell’s comments provided a number of interesting anecdotes on the state of the reverse mortgage industry.

Bell talked about the risks to both borrowers and lenders. Borrowers risks include finding out they do not have enough money to remain in the home due to property taxes and insurance. These issues, which we have covered extensively in the past few weeks, only effect 2% of borrowers, and efforts are underway to help mitigate those risks.  Lenders risks include being stuck funding a loan that is unable to get a certified by HUD.  HUD is reducing this risk, by decreasing the Principle Limit Factors last week, and eliminating the need for a credit subsidy to the reverse mortgage program.

However, Bell’s main purpose in his testimony appeared to be to convince the House Subcommittee to extend the current reverse mortgage limits and to ultimately return to the prior Principle Limit Factors.  HECMs have had a net gain of 7 billion dollars in the course of the program, and Bell argues that reverse mortgages have not played a role in the FHA’s recent capital reserve problems.  Reverse mortgages are expected to operate on a break even or better basis in the future.

Furthermore, recent changes to the program will impede the ability of seniors to get a reverse mortgage. Over 20% of reverse mortgage borrowers in the last year would not have qualified if the Principle Limit Factors had been reduced to their current levels when they applied for the loan.  New technology has reduced costs for lenders, and Bell maintains that the numbers used by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) are not realistic, since the average lifetime of a reverse mortgage loan is 7 years regardless of the age of the borrower. Older borrowers average the same length of time with a reverse mortgage as younger borrowers.  Bell was passionate that the reverse mortgage program has been self-sustaining and will continue to operate as such.

The President of NRMLA, Peter Bell, is currently testifying about reverse mortgages for the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity. His testimony (as well as the rest of the hearing) can be viewed at:

http://boss.streamos.com/wmedia-live/financialserv/16489/300_financialserv-qwertyuiop_070131.asx

As the committee chairwoman said earlier, without the FHA, there would be no mortgage market right now. We will have more coverage of the testimony as it occurs later, for those of you who are unable to watch live.

The hearing appears to be more about the health of the FHA and the amount of reserves remaining, but so far contains interesting information for those interested in the business side of reverse mortgages, wholesaling, and the mortgage industry as a whole.

In a move that is designed to help the housing industry, the Wall Street Journal reported today that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are working on a program to help smaller banks get the short term credit needed to help them make home loans. This would come in the form of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac making advance commitments to buy home loans that meet a certain criteria.  The program builds on a pilot program already underway between Freddie Mac and NattyMac and Provident Lender Associates LP.

While it seems that much of this plan has yet to be announced, any assistance to small banks appears to be welcome.  Another column in the Wall Street Journal pointed out that there are over 8,000 mortgage lenders nationwide (not counting reverse mortgage lenders).  When one considers that the majority of mortgage loans tend to be completed by the three major banks- Wells Fargo, Bank of America,  and JP Morgan Chase. These three lenders alone account for 52% of new home mortgages, up 15% from the 37% market share for the top 3 lenders in 2007.  An increase in market share for the top lenders likely doesn’t bode well for the industry though. As a result, it will be interesting to see if the plan with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will help revitalize the mortgage industry by helping the smaller lenders.

Apartment vacancies reached 7.8% nationwide in the 3rd quarter, the highest point since 1986. The rate is expected to continue to rise in the winter months, which have continually seen lower demand for renters, as people are more likely to move during the warmer months. Nationally, effective rents have fallen 2.7% this past year, to around $972. However, this number is deceiving, as some markets have been hit harder than others. In fact, in the third quarter, 26 markets saw their vacancy rates improve, while 11 saw them remain stagnant. 42 markets saw their vacancies increase, the most dramatic being in Omaha, Nebraska, where they went up by 1.1% to 7.4%.

But the increased vacancy rates are not always correlating most strongly to decreases in rent. The biggest rent decreases are being found in San Jose, CA and New York City, with declines of 8.0% and 6.8% respectively. The decreasing rents and increasing vacancies have made it easier for renters to negotiate on prices and to shop around until they find the perfect place (and price). In addition, many former renters have bought homes for the first time taking advantage of the federal tax credit and the low housing prices.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning October 6, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.494

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.744

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.994

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.244

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.66

HECM LIBOR 250: 5.91

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.16

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.41

While the HECM LIBOR APR remained constant this week, the expected rate declined considerably, dropping two tenths of a point. Borrowers should see savings from such an interest rate decline, and hopefully the low rates will continue.  This is the first full week that the new PLF limits will be in effect.

September’s HECM volume report as published by HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Development) showed that the number of HECMs endorsed increased by about 500 loans from August to September. The number of HECMs endorsed in September was 9,473, while 8,933 HECMs were endorsed in August. However, this number does not reflect the dramatic increase in the number of case numbers assigned the last week in September during the final days of the former PLF limits. As such, the number of HECMs endorsed should rise rapidly in October and November, as they are processed and closed.

In the meantime, the HECM lenders in the top 10 remained unchanged from August. These top 10 lenders are measured by the total number of HECMs endorsed so far this year, explaining why some lenders that have left the reverse mortgage business are still in the top 10.  The list is as follows:

1. Wells Fargo

2. Bank of America

3. World Alliance Financial Corp

4. Financial Freedom

5. One Reverse Mortgage

6. MetLife Bank

7. Countrywide Financial

8. Generation Mortgage

9. Urban Financial Group

10. 1st AAA Reverse Mortgage

It will be very interesting to see if this list changes in the next two months as the number of HECMs endorsed increases dramatically. The complete list for September can be found on the HUD website. The changes will be reflected on the Reverse Mortgage Guides website in the Lender Directory within the next week.

Tax and Insurance questions were one of the most interesting issues raised at the MBA Reverse Mortgage Conference in San Diego earlier this month.  As the reverse mortgage product evolved, they are also two questions that are likely to be closely attended to.

A report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) cited the phrase “Never lose your home” as a problem in reverse mortgage advertising because if a borrower does not pay the tax and insurance obligations on the home, the borrower can be foreclosed upon. Right now 2% of all reverse mortgages go into default due to so-called T&I issues. However when these issues were discussed at the MBA conference, it appeared that there were things that borrowers could easily do to avoid these potential problems. Many just did not know they could do so.

One is to set up a tax and insurance set-aside account.  Doing so would take some of the reverse mortgage proceeds and set them aside to pay taxes and insurance on the home. This would assure that the borrower always has the money to pay for taxes and insurance and that they are paid automatically.  It is one easy way for a borrower to handle the tax and insurance obligation. However, many borrowers currently do not take advantage of this option.

Another is that there are many tax exemptions for seniors.  However, many seniors do not realize they are eligible. Seniors should inquire with their states and municipalities about property tax exemptions that they may be eligible for.  While there is often a lot of red-tape surrounding these exemptions, they can save seniors significant amounts of money.

Tax and insurance obligations do not need to be reasons for a reverse mortgage to default. If borrowers are responsible and plan in advance, they can alleviate the obligations before they ever become a problem.

Financial Freedom announced that effective immediately, it too is discontinuing fixed-rate reverse mortgage loans in Illinois. This comes after Bank of America stopped offering its fixed-rate product in Illinois.  All these changes are due to concerns about the Illinois High Risk Home Loan Act (HRHLA) which only applies in the state of Illinois. The act is designed to protect borrowers against high-cost loans, and applies to all kinds of loans and mortgages.  Under the threshold set by HRHLA, many fixed-rate products are high cost, since the total closing costs often exceed 5% of the principal limit of the loan.

It is important to note that the fixed-rate product changes in Illinois do not affect any other states. Meanwhile, borrowers in Illinois can still complete reverse mortgages using the LIBOR, while local lenders wait for changes to the HRHLA to be enacted.  That said, MetLife and Reverseit are still offering their fixed-rate products… at least for the time being.

With the principal limit factor decreasing by 10% tomorrow, the number of reverse mortgage case numbers assigned has surged in the last few days. A letter from Peter Bell, President of NRMLA, announced that 60,784 case numbers had been requested in “the last few days.”  That is more than half the number of HECMs endorsed in all of FY 2009.

The good news is that, so far, the system seems to be working. Of the 60,784 case numbers, 58,631 were issued in less than two seconds, and an additional 1,800 were issued in less than 10 seconds. These turnaround times are a good omen for those concerned about the FHA Connection system’s ability to handle the increase in demand. However, with about 12 hours until the deadline, it’s too early to alleviate all concern.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. The rates are effective for the week beginning September 29, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.496

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.746

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.996

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.246

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.86

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.11

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.36

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.61

While the HECM LIBOR APR remained constant this week, the expected rate declined slightly. As this is the last week that borrowers will be able to get in under the old Principal Limit Factors (PLF) before the new PLFs go into effect on Thursday, the decline in expected rate is welcome.