With the 2009 fiscal year ending on September 30, this month’s HECM volume report revealed a new list of the top 10 reverse mortgage lenders, very much changed from that of last fiscal year.  The list is below, compared to that of 2009 FY. However, given how close many of the lenders are to each other in terms of the number of HECMs they endorsed, it is by no means clear how the list will shake out over the next few months.

October 2009:

1. Wells Fargo

2. Bank of America

3. MetLife Bank

4. Financial Freedom Acquisition

5. One Reverse Mortgage

6. 1st AAA Reverse Mortgage

7. First Mariner Bank

8. Security One Lending

9. Harvard Home Mortgage

10. Stay in Home Mortgage

Fiscal Year 2009:

1. Wells Fargo

2. Bank of America

3. World Alliance Financial Corp

4. Financial Freedom

5. One Reverse Mortgage

6. MetLife Bank

7. Countrywide Financial

8. Generation Mortgage

9. Urban Financial Group

10. 1st AAA Reverse Mortgage

Thus, from last year’s top 10, only 6 remain in the top 10 for October. The complete list for October can be found on the HUD website. The changes will also be reflected on the Reverse Mortgage Guides website in the Lender Directory in the near future.

We knew that reverse mortgage applications were likely to jump to new levels in September, but we did not know how much- until now. September’s FHA Outlook report shows a 72.4% increase in HECM applications in September versus August.  19,055 HECM applications were submitted in September, versus 11,051 in August.

Therefore, while only 9,473 reverse mortgages were endorsed by the FHA in September, up from 8,933 in August, the number appears poised to climb in October and November, as those who applied before the principle limit factors fell 10% on October 1st complete their applications. It is also interesting to note that the number of purchases and refinances made up a very small percentage of the reverse mortgages endorsed, with 137 HECMs for Purchase and 790 HECM Refinances endorsed in September.

Finally, as the fiscal year ended, it is good to see that the FHA’s predictions were fairly in line with the actual results.  162,619 HECM applications were filed, as opposed to the 165,000 projected in FY 2009. Of those, 114,691 HECMs were endorsed in FY 2009. This is an increase of 2.3% from last year, though still below the projected 119,700 endorsements. Nonetheless, it appears that the reverse mortgage industry grew in FY 2009, despite the recession, and appears poised for a strong beginning to FY 2010.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning November 3, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.494

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.744

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.994

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.244

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.91

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.16

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.41

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.66

The HECM LIBOR APR remained almost unchanged for the sixth consecutive week. However, the expected rates continued to rise. This week saw a dramatic increase by .08 for the borrowers.  It will be interesting to see when the APR finally changes, and, when it does, whether the expected rates will adjust is the same direction.

Last week a bi-partisan deal was announced in the Senate that will likely pave the way for the new homebuyer’s tax credit to be extended through April 2010.  The deal also includes plans for a significant expansion of the tax credit, raising the income requirements to $125,000 per individual and $225,000 per couple from $75,000 per individual and $150,000 per couple. This expansion means that many more individuals will be eligible for the tax credit than were previously. Finally, the deal added a $6,500 tax credit will be available to homeowners wishing to move out of their current home into a more expensive one.

I have been thinking about the deal all weekend, and I worry about its effects. While the goal of the credit is to strengthen the market and help bring home prices back up, increasing income requirements and adding a tax credit to incentivize trading up seems like it risks exacerbating the current problems in the housing market.  Many of the current problems in the housing market have been created by homeowners (many first-time homeowners) taking out mortgages that were more than they could afford to pay in order to buy homes. Even when they could afford the mortgage, the recent economic problems have led many to be out of work or find their401(k)s and pensions to be less than they had expected. Consequently, the number of foreclosures and mortgage delinquencies reached all time highs in recent months.

In light of these developments, some proposed that maybe homeownership should no longer be an essential part of the American Dream.  It was argued that it is a disservice to put people into homes they cannot afford. While the tax credit is not a very large sum of money, it is enough money to push individuals to act in uncertain times.  A realtor in Portland, ME commented that nearly 70% of their clients were motivated by the tax credit. Yes, the housing market could use a boost, but when individuals are making a significant long-term financial decision for a short-term financial incentive, it seems like many poor choices can occur.

Reverse mortgages and refinances are available to help homeowners who find themselves over-extended, but reverse mortgages are only available to those over 62, and refinances and short pays have been extremely hard to get.  To avoid another housing crisis, the government does need to stimulate the market, but putting more borrowers into homes they cannot afford does not seem to be a safe way to do so.

Yesterday, Congress passed the continuing resolution we discussed yesterday, extending the HECM loan limit through the 2010 fiscal year.  The continuing resolution is now headed for the President’s signature, which it is expected to receive.  The continuing resolution means that the reverse mortgage loan limit will remain at $625,500.  The change reduces uncertainty about the future of the loan limits for HECM reverse mortgages.  As mentioned yesterday, the continuing resolution also includes jumbo conforming loans and conforming loans, two kinds of forward mortgages.

An appropriations bill has been proposed that will extend the FHA reverse mortgage limits until the end of 2010.  The current limit of $625,500 is currently set to expire at the end of the year unless new appropriations are made. The appropriations bill still needs to pass the House of Representatives and the Senate. The extensions would also apply to Jumbo Conforming Loans and Conforming Loans, two kinds of forward or conventional mortgages.

Many in the industry appear to be hopeful that the bill will be passed before the limits expire.  It is probably too early to become extremely concerned about the expiring limits, but with the bill needing to pass through both houses of Congress, it is something to keep an eye on.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning October 27, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.494

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.744

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.994

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.244

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.83

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.08

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.33

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.58

The HECM LIBOR APR remained almost unchanged for the fifth consecutive week. Meanwhile, the expected rates continued to rise, though they only rose by three hundredths of a point.  One wonders when the APR will finally change, and, when it does, in which direction it will go.

In the past, we have explained reverse mortgage terms. Today, we will explain some home mortgage terms:

Some Important Home Mortgage Terms Explained

Banks and other lenders offer mortgages to borrowers who want to buy homes and don’t have the required cash to make upfront payment for them. The lenders utilize the homes as collateral or security for their loans. If the borrower defaults on the contracted payments, then they can lose their homes to foreclosure. There are various forms of mortgage loans and various mortgage terms used in mortgage related discussions. You can also refer to a dictionary for home mortgage terms to have a better understanding. Following are some important mortgage terms that you would frequently come across in mortgage deals.

Adjustable Rate Mortgage

ARMs or adjustable rate mortgages usually have a fixed rate of interest at the beginning of the loan term and subsequently, they get reset to the market average. For instance, a 5/1 ARM would carry a fixed rate of interest for the initial five years and subsequently, it would get reset to the market rate every year. These loans are beneficial for those people who secure a mortgage when interest rates are escalating.

Fixed Rate Mortgage

Fixed rate mortgages come with a predetermined rate for the whole tenure of the loan. These loans are advantageous for locking in an affordable rate and for borrowers who need the security to understand that they would have a uniform monthly payment.

Annual Percentage Rate

APR or Annual Percentage Rate represents the real borrowing costs of a mortgage loan. Individuals with good credit scores typically qualify for lower APRs.

Down Payment

This is a portion of the home value that you have to pay at the beginning of the loan. A bigger down payment would lead to improved terms for the loan since it guarantees the lender that they would receive the payments.

Loan Term

The loan term is the length of time throughout which the loan has to be paid off. The higher the loan term, the less would be your monthly payments. However, if the tenure is extensive, then you would land up paying a huge amount of interest throughout the whole term of the loan.

Mortgage Points

Mortgage points or discount points are charges that you pay at the beginning of the loan. Every mortgage point is equal to 1% of the loan amount. Hence, if you are asked to pay 3 points on a $200,000 loan, you would pay $6,000. Lenders permit you to pay points or prepaid interest to lessen your interest rate.

The government’s $8,000 tax credit to new homebuyers has been under a lot of scrutiny in recent months. The tax credit was designed to help stimulate the housing market and lead to increased home ownership. To that end, it has been extremely successful.  However, abuses within the system appear to have also been quite high.  While the reverse mortgage industry found itself under scrutiny for what appear to be under about a dozen complaints, the federal government has started 167 criminal investigations and 107,000 civil investigations into possible fraud.   Of the 1.4 million people who claimed the over 10 billion dollars in tax credits in 2008-2009, 60% had incomes under $50,000– leading to questions as to whether they could even afford a home.

The new homebuyer tax credit has certainly had many positive effects.  Of the 1.4 million home sales, 350,000 to 400,000 were estimated to be a direct result of the credit’s availability.  That accounts for 25-30% of the eligible home sales. In some areas, real estate agents have reported that up to 70% of their clients were considering buying a home as a direct result of the tax credit. With sales of existing homes at their highest level in two years, many are attributing the strong numbers to the tax credit, which expires November 30.  Sales increased 9.4% in September according to the National Association of Realtors.

So which is it? It seems that the tax credit likely has had a positive effect on the market. However, the rock-bottom prices and increased inventory have also likely contributed to many first-time buyers choosing to enter the market.  The increase in first-time homebuyers is a good sign for the real estate industry, but it is still a disconcerting one. If 60% of the 1.4 million people who claimed the tax credit from 2008-2009 had incomes of under $50,000, could they really afford to own a home? Will we see another foreclosure crisis within the mortgage industry down the line as these homebuyers are faced with rising rates or declining incomes? The answer to these questions remains to be seen.

While the pros of the tax credit may outweigh the cons, with the damage to the real estate industry wiping out the savings of many throughout the country, if the credit is extended, it should be done so with caution.  While the image of every American owning a home is a promising one, the government has an obligation to ensure that those owning homes can actually afford to do so.  Otherwise, history is at risk of repeating itself.

Sources: The New York Times: Home Tax Credit Audit Shows Abuses
The New York Times: Tax Credit Lifts Home Sales to Two-Year High
The Associated Press: Northeast Home Resales Post 11 Pct Annual Increase

HUD released the long awaited new RESPA FAQs this morning. The document contains many common questions and answers about complying with RESPA.

RESPA, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act first passed in 1974, is the source of many of the basic federal reverse mortgage required disclosures, including the HUD-1 statement and the Good Faith Estimate (GFE).  Most of the questions in the RESPA FAQs released this morning address the HUD-1 and GFE. There is also a specific section on reverse mortgages.

RESPA Rule FAQs

After already announcing a delay of the implementation of Mortgagee Letter 2009-19 to case numbers assigned on or after November 2, 2009, the Reverse Review reported today that HUD has delayed the implementation further. Guidance is expected from HUD in the next two weeks clarifying Mortgagee Letter 2009-19 and offering additional leniencies to address the difficult current market conditions.  The changes will then go into effect on December 7, 2009.

For those who forgot, Mortgagee Letter 2009-19 changed the condominium approval process and condo unit eligibility for reverse mortgages. The Mortgagee Letter can be found at Mortgagee Letter 2009-19.

Today’s Wall Street Journal featured a very interesting article on how Bank of America is using reverse mortgages to save senior borrowers. The cases include situations where Bank of America has taken a significant write down to allow the borrowers to stay in their homes.  But not all borrowers may receive the same treatment as the borrowers highlighted in the article. As the story notes, most borrowers who received the modified reverse mortgage had taken out option ARMs.

Option ARMs (Option Adjustable Rate Mortgages) have become “the new subprime mortgages,” leading many borrowers into foreclosure. 32% of option ARM borrowers were delinquent or in foreclosure last month, compared with 48% of subprime mortgage borrowers.  Unlike subprime mortgages, option ARM mortgages generally went to borrowers with good credit, including seniors with significant equity in their homes looking to refinance. The option ARMs have also proved difficult to modify, since the low interest rates on the loan often cannot be lowered any further.   Lawsuits have been filed by borrowers claiming they were misinformed of the loan’s complicated structure, which in many cases can lead payments to balloon after a few years.

As a result of the lawsuits, as well as the settlement of a suit against Countrywide, which was since acquired by Bank of America, Bank of America has agreed to modify option ARMs and subprime mortgages where possible.  While it appears that Bank of America has so far only issued about 20 reverse mortgages to borrowers with option ARMs, it looks like a good start to fixing a significant problem. Borrowers with option ARMs from Bank of America may want to talk to their servicer or the bank about a modification, perhaps with a reverse mortgage.

Bank of America announced this morning that it is resuming offering fixed-rate reverse mortgage loans in Illinois.  The decision comes after Bank of America has reviewed its policies relative to Illinois’ High Risk Home Loan Act (HRHLA) and determined that the loans can be offered as long as they meet the following criteria:

- Closing costs, defined as all costs paid by the borrower directly or indirectly, do not exceed 5% of the total loan amount.

- Bank of America’s  high cost worksheet must be completed.

- Bank of America’s high cost worksheet must be submitted to fulfillment and indicate that the loan has “passed” the high cost test.

Says the letter, “Bank of America stands behind its commitment to provide clarity and transparency to home lending. To that end, we have chosen not to engage in the production of high cost loans.”  Bank of America also announced that loans declined when the product was suspended September 16th can now be re-submitted for approval. The decision should come as welcome news to reverse mortgage lenders in Illinois.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning October 20, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.495

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.745

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.995

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.245

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.89

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.05

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.30

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.55

The HECM LIBOR APR remained almost unchanged for the fourth consecutive week.  However, expected rates rose significantly. The expected rates are up .15 this week.  One hopes this is not the beginning of an upward trend. After a short week last week, these rates will be good for a full seven days.

This weekend’s New York Times features a special section on retirement. The section, which can be found online as well as in print, features articles on Medicare, job hunting, 401Ks, and even reverse mortgages. However, it is frustrating that the piece on reverse mortgages is very vague and generic.  The piece talks about reverse mortgages as a last resort, primarily for those who do not want to leave the home to their heirs.  But this is the opposite of what some other media pieces have talked about in recent months, where a reverse mortgage was used as an estate planning tool in order to help borrowers pass on larger amounts to their heirs by avoiding the estate tax.

Nonetheless, with the exception of the vague reverse mortgage information, many other articles within the section may be useful to our readers.

Reverse Mortgage Guides added two new videos for consumers to the site today.  The videos can also be found on YouTube.  Reverse Mortgage Guides is excited to be able to offer this valuable feature to our visitors.

The videos can currently be found on the “What is a Reverse Mortgage” page and the “Pros and Cons” page.  More videos will be added soon.

In addition, if you would like to contribute a video to the site, please comment below or contact reva.minkoff (at) reversemortgageguides.org.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning October 14, 2009.

NOTE: The rates initially published on October 13th were incorrect by 1 thousandth of a point. Please consult the rates below moving forward.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.495

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.745

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.995

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.245

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.65

HECM LIBOR 250: 5.90

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.15

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.40

The HECM LIBOR APR remained almost unchanged for the third consecutive week.  The expected rate only decreased by one hundredth of a point. Due to the Columbus Day Holiday, these rates will only be in effect from October 14th to October 19th.

This weekend Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed AB 329 into law in California. The bill finally establishes the Reverse Mortgage Elder Protection Act of 2009. The bill prohibits cross-selling, requires the lender to provide the borrower with no fewer than 10 nonprofit HUD-approved counseling agencies, and requires the lender to provide the borrower with a checklist of issues to discuss with the reverse mortgage counselor.  The loan application will be unable to be approved without the signed checklist.  However, given that the first two requirements are included in national legislation, the main feature of the bill will be the addition of the checklist to the reverse mortgage counseling process.

The provisions of the bill will be administered by both the California Department of Real Estate and the California Department of Corporations.

The bill can be found at: AB 329

Today marks the one week anniversary of the shift to the new HECM roster.  The new roster means that the new requirements for reverse mortgage counselors have gone into effect.  Only counselors that have met these requirements will be permitted to provide HECM counseling. As a result, the number of agencies providing HECM counseling have, for the time being at least, decreased dramatically. Some states, such as Delaware and Hawaii, do not have any local counseling agencies that have met the new requirements and are on the HECM roster.  However, since many counseling agencies provide counseling on a national level by phone, borrowers in these states are unlikely to feel any ill effects.

The list of new counselors can be found at: https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/hecm_agency_look.cfm

NRMLA President Peter Bell testified in front of the House Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development today as part of a panel of witnesses on the future of the FHA. While Commissioner Stevens’ statements were written up in the New York Times, Bell’s comments provided a number of interesting anecdotes on the state of the reverse mortgage industry.

Bell talked about the risks to both borrowers and lenders. Borrowers risks include finding out they do not have enough money to remain in the home due to property taxes and insurance. These issues, which we have covered extensively in the past few weeks, only effect 2% of borrowers, and efforts are underway to help mitigate those risks.  Lenders risks include being stuck funding a loan that is unable to get a certified by HUD.  HUD is reducing this risk, by decreasing the Principle Limit Factors last week, and eliminating the need for a credit subsidy to the reverse mortgage program.

However, Bell’s main purpose in his testimony appeared to be to convince the House Subcommittee to extend the current reverse mortgage limits and to ultimately return to the prior Principle Limit Factors.  HECMs have had a net gain of 7 billion dollars in the course of the program, and Bell argues that reverse mortgages have not played a role in the FHA’s recent capital reserve problems.  Reverse mortgages are expected to operate on a break even or better basis in the future.

Furthermore, recent changes to the program will impede the ability of seniors to get a reverse mortgage. Over 20% of reverse mortgage borrowers in the last year would not have qualified if the Principle Limit Factors had been reduced to their current levels when they applied for the loan.  New technology has reduced costs for lenders, and Bell maintains that the numbers used by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) are not realistic, since the average lifetime of a reverse mortgage loan is 7 years regardless of the age of the borrower. Older borrowers average the same length of time with a reverse mortgage as younger borrowers.  Bell was passionate that the reverse mortgage program has been self-sustaining and will continue to operate as such.

The President of NRMLA, Peter Bell, is currently testifying about reverse mortgages for the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity. His testimony (as well as the rest of the hearing) can be viewed at:

http://boss.streamos.com/wmedia-live/financialserv/16489/300_financialserv-qwertyuiop_070131.asx

As the committee chairwoman said earlier, without the FHA, there would be no mortgage market right now. We will have more coverage of the testimony as it occurs later, for those of you who are unable to watch live.

The hearing appears to be more about the health of the FHA and the amount of reserves remaining, but so far contains interesting information for those interested in the business side of reverse mortgages, wholesaling, and the mortgage industry as a whole.

In a move that is designed to help the housing industry, the Wall Street Journal reported today that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are working on a program to help smaller banks get the short term credit needed to help them make home loans. This would come in the form of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac making advance commitments to buy home loans that meet a certain criteria.  The program builds on a pilot program already underway between Freddie Mac and NattyMac and Provident Lender Associates LP.

While it seems that much of this plan has yet to be announced, any assistance to small banks appears to be welcome.  Another column in the Wall Street Journal pointed out that there are over 8,000 mortgage lenders nationwide (not counting reverse mortgage lenders).  When one considers that the majority of mortgage loans tend to be completed by the three major banks- Wells Fargo, Bank of America,  and JP Morgan Chase. These three lenders alone account for 52% of new home mortgages, up 15% from the 37% market share for the top 3 lenders in 2007.  An increase in market share for the top lenders likely doesn’t bode well for the industry though. As a result, it will be interesting to see if the plan with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will help revitalize the mortgage industry by helping the smaller lenders.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. These rates are effective for the week beginning October 6, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.494

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.744

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.994

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.244

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.66

HECM LIBOR 250: 5.91

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.16

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.41

While the HECM LIBOR APR remained constant this week, the expected rate declined considerably, dropping two tenths of a point. Borrowers should see savings from such an interest rate decline, and hopefully the low rates will continue.  This is the first full week that the new PLF limits will be in effect.

September’s HECM volume report as published by HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Development) showed that the number of HECMs endorsed increased by about 500 loans from August to September. The number of HECMs endorsed in September was 9,473, while 8,933 HECMs were endorsed in August. However, this number does not reflect the dramatic increase in the number of case numbers assigned the last week in September during the final days of the former PLF limits. As such, the number of HECMs endorsed should rise rapidly in October and November, as they are processed and closed.

In the meantime, the HECM lenders in the top 10 remained unchanged from August. These top 10 lenders are measured by the total number of HECMs endorsed so far this year, explaining why some lenders that have left the reverse mortgage business are still in the top 10.  The list is as follows:

1. Wells Fargo

2. Bank of America

3. World Alliance Financial Corp

4. Financial Freedom

5. One Reverse Mortgage

6. MetLife Bank

7. Countrywide Financial

8. Generation Mortgage

9. Urban Financial Group

10. 1st AAA Reverse Mortgage

It will be very interesting to see if this list changes in the next two months as the number of HECMs endorsed increases dramatically. The complete list for September can be found on the HUD website. The changes will be reflected on the Reverse Mortgage Guides website in the Lender Directory within the next week.

Tax and Insurance questions were one of the most interesting issues raised at the MBA Reverse Mortgage Conference in San Diego earlier this month.  As the reverse mortgage product evolved, they are also two questions that are likely to be closely attended to.

A report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) cited the phrase “Never lose your home” as a problem in reverse mortgage advertising because if a borrower does not pay the tax and insurance obligations on the home, the borrower can be foreclosed upon. Right now 2% of all reverse mortgages go into default due to so-called T&I issues. However when these issues were discussed at the MBA conference, it appeared that there were things that borrowers could easily do to avoid these potential problems. Many just did not know they could do so.

One is to set up a tax and insurance set-aside account.  Doing so would take some of the reverse mortgage proceeds and set them aside to pay taxes and insurance on the home. This would assure that the borrower always has the money to pay for taxes and insurance and that they are paid automatically.  It is one easy way for a borrower to handle the tax and insurance obligation. However, many borrowers currently do not take advantage of this option.

Another is that there are many tax exemptions for seniors.  However, many seniors do not realize they are eligible. Seniors should inquire with their states and municipalities about property tax exemptions that they may be eligible for.  While there is often a lot of red-tape surrounding these exemptions, they can save seniors significant amounts of money.

Tax and insurance obligations do not need to be reasons for a reverse mortgage to default. If borrowers are responsible and plan in advance, they can alleviate the obligations before they ever become a problem.

Financial Freedom announced that effective immediately, it too is discontinuing fixed-rate reverse mortgage loans in Illinois. This comes after Bank of America stopped offering its fixed-rate product in Illinois.  All these changes are due to concerns about the Illinois High Risk Home Loan Act (HRHLA) which only applies in the state of Illinois. The act is designed to protect borrowers against high-cost loans, and applies to all kinds of loans and mortgages.  Under the threshold set by HRHLA, many fixed-rate products are high cost, since the total closing costs often exceed 5% of the principal limit of the loan.

It is important to note that the fixed-rate product changes in Illinois do not affect any other states. Meanwhile, borrowers in Illinois can still complete reverse mortgages using the LIBOR, while local lenders wait for changes to the HRHLA to be enacted.  That said, MetLife and Reverseit are still offering their fixed-rate products… at least for the time being.

With the principal limit factor decreasing by 10% tomorrow, the number of reverse mortgage case numbers assigned has surged in the last few days. A letter from Peter Bell, President of NRMLA, announced that 60,784 case numbers had been requested in “the last few days.”  That is more than half the number of HECMs endorsed in all of FY 2009.

The good news is that, so far, the system seems to be working. Of the 60,784 case numbers, 58,631 were issued in less than two seconds, and an additional 1,800 were issued in less than 10 seconds. These turnaround times are a good omen for those concerned about the FHA Connection system’s ability to handle the increase in demand. However, with about 12 hours until the deadline, it’s too early to alleviate all concern.

This week’s reverse mortgage rates are below. The rates are effective for the week beginning September 29, 2009.

APR:

HECM LIBOR 225: 2.496

HECM LIBOR 250: 2.746

HECM LIBOR 275: 2.996

HECM LIBOR 300: 3.246

Expected Rates:

HECM LIBOR 225: 5.86

HECM LIBOR 250: 6.11

HECM LIBOR 275: 6.36

HECM LIBOR 300: 6.61

While the HECM LIBOR APR remained constant this week, the expected rate declined slightly. As this is the last week that borrowers will be able to get in under the old Principal Limit Factors (PLF) before the new PLFs go into effect on Thursday, the decline in expected rate is welcome.

Genworth Financial Home Equity Access has announced it is coming out with a fixed rate reverse mortgage product, with a 5.625% interest rate. Genworth is likely to be the last large wholesaler to announce a fixed rate reverse mortgage product, but with a lot of lenders reporting slow turn times with the fixed rate products at wholesalers, this will hopefully help alleviate some of the congestion within the market. The more wholesalers that offer reverse mortgage products, the faster the industry turn times will be.

HUD just announced today that effective October 1, 2009, the principal limit factor (PLF) on reverse mortgages will be reduced by 10%. The new PLF table can be found at:  http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/hecm/hecmhomelenders.cfm.  This PLF table will go into effect for all loans taken on or after October 1, 2009.

These changes to the principal limit are not a large surprise, given the appropriations bills now going through Congress.  The reverse mortgage program was not designed to be supported by a credit subsidy, and since the appropriations bill is also unlikely to grant a subsidy, program changes are the only way to keep the reverse mortgage program operating in the new fiscal year (which begins October 1, 2009).  Nonetheless, these changes are not likely to be embraced by the reverse mortgage community, as they will prevent some seniors from receiving the amount of money from their homes necessary to be eligible for the program.  A reverse mortgage was designed to help as many seniors as possible. This is likely to reduce their ability to do so.

The mortgagee letter can be found below:

Mortgagee Letter 09-34